<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One of a kind &#8211; Generating UUID with EMF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/</link>
	<description>Tips around Eclipse and Android programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:32:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schindl</title>
		<link>http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-4517</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schindl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vogella.de/blog/?p=2176#comment-4517</guid>
		<description>For those interested I&#039;ve written a small Eclipse Plugin to make generating UUIDs as simple as possible when you are inside your IDE. For more details see: http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2010/10/20/uuid-generator-plugin/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested I&#8217;ve written a small Eclipse Plugin to make generating UUIDs as simple as possible when you are inside your IDE. For more details see: <a href="http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2010/10/20/uuid-generator-plugin/" rel="nofollow">http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2010/10/20/uuid-generator-plugin/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remy Chi Jian Suen</title>
		<link>http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Remy Chi Jian Suen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vogella.de/blog/?p=2176#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>I think EMF might have introduced its own variant because EMF did not originally target 1.5. I myself did not know of the java.util.UUID class until I read Bryan&#039;s comment since I&#039;ve primarily been working with 1.4 until e4 came along. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think EMF might have introduced its own variant because EMF did not originally target 1.5. I myself did not know of the java.util.UUID class until I read Bryan&#8217;s comment since I&#8217;ve primarily been working with 1.4 until e4 came along. <img src='http://www.vogella.de/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dann Martens</title>
		<link>http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Dann Martens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vogella.de/blog/?p=2176#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>@Lars No worries! As a well-known critic of the role of EMF in e4, this type of thing is just &#039;Gefundenes Fressen&#039;. I am perfectly happy to see EMF continue its MDD quest, but not as a core part of the framework. I feel that EMF lacks the maturity and the broad appeal it needs to warrant adoption on this level by this community.

Because EMF is being pushed down our throats, I now have to spend time on criticizing, instead of on helping the Eclipse community to work for everyone. That&#039;s pretty sad.

EMF wants to be in the driver seat? You&#039;d better buckle up, then :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lars No worries! As a well-known critic of the role of EMF in e4, this type of thing is just &#8216;Gefundenes Fressen&#8217;. I am perfectly happy to see EMF continue its MDD quest, but not as a core part of the framework. I feel that EMF lacks the maturity and the broad appeal it needs to warrant adoption on this level by this community.</p>
<p>Because EMF is being pushed down our throats, I now have to spend time on criticizing, instead of on helping the Eclipse community to work for everyone. That&#8217;s pretty sad.</p>
<p>EMF wants to be in the driver seat? You&#8217;d better buckle up, then <img src='http://www.vogella.de/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Vogel</title>
		<link>http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Vogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vogella.de/blog/?p=2176#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>@Dann Sorry, but I don&#039;t know why EMF has re-implemented this. I&#039;m also not aware of the difference between both implementations. If you want to know I suggest to check on the EMF forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dann Sorry, but I don&#8217;t know why EMF has re-implemented this. I&#8217;m also not aware of the difference between both implementations. If you want to know I suggest to check on the EMF forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dann Martens</title>
		<link>http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Dann Martens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vogella.de/blog/?p=2176#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>I am a bit puzzled by this claim. Being familiar with this RFC, I know it details different versions and variants, which can be particularly relevant for the context the UUID is used in.

The UUID utility class from the java.util library supports several of these. Why exactly has this wheel been reinvented? 

Ironically, as I consider a project like EMF quite bloated, should I now conclude that part of the cause for that is that standard Java classes have been rewritten?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bit puzzled by this claim. Being familiar with this RFC, I know it details different versions and variants, which can be particularly relevant for the context the UUID is used in.</p>
<p>The UUID utility class from the java.util library supports several of these. Why exactly has this wheel been reinvented? </p>
<p>Ironically, as I consider a project like EMF quite bloated, should I now conclude that part of the cause for that is that standard Java classes have been rewritten?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Vogel</title>
		<link>http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Vogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vogella.de/blog/?p=2176#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>@Bryan: Thanks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bryan: Thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.vogella.de/blog/2010/03/11/emf-unique-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vogella.de/blog/?p=2176#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>You can also use java.util.UUID.randomUUID() to achive the same result without EMF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also use java.util.UUID.randomUUID() to achive the same result without EMF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

